Great Deal from Dell™
Close Me

Great Deal from Dell™
Dell™ XPS™ M1530 - Powered by Intel® Centrino® processor technology
+ FREE Hard Drive Upgrade

 
 
Sunday, 23 November 2008 03:42 AM
 
 
 
 
982 visitors online
Main Menu
Home
News
Forums
Links
Contact Us
Search
Advertising
Guides
Reviews
Demographics
Administrator
Lowyat Pricelists






nokia
sony


Advertisements



Mobile Number Portability in June 2007?
(13 votes)
by Andrew Kok   
Monday, 15 January 2007 02:49 PM

We're still two weeks fresh into 2007 and the issue of Mobile Number Portability (MNP) has finally reared its elusive head, after lying dormant for the whole of 2006. The Star reports that the long-awaited MNP implementation (long-awaited by consumers at least) will hit our airwaves as soon as June 2007.

What the hey is MNP you ask? MNP basically allows users to freely switch between cellular providers without giving up their current mobile number. If all goes according to plan, by June 2007 you could keep your current 012 number while using DiGi as your new mobile provider, for example.

MNP has been touted as a solution to the customer service woes faced by local mobile users; consumers could easily switch providers if they find their current provider to be, in scientific terms, crappy, as the barrier of losing their current mobile number has been removed.

Unfortunately, the history of MNP in Malaysia has been sputtering at best. Originally mooted in 2004, a public inquiry paper (warning: PDF link) was released by the MCMC on September 1 2005. Since then, little has been heard of it. A quick Google search turns up this October 2005 article from Mobile World, but nary else of note turns up in Google's record of Internet history.

Now that MNP is almost here, fingers crossed, we should be celebrating right? Not so quick. As noted in the Mobile World article, local mobile providers are free to impose charges for number porting (although RM10 seems fair to me). There's also the possibility of the dreaded bugaboo faced by mobile phone users in other countries finally arriving at our shores: the one-or-two-year lock-in contract.

I personally await June 2007 with mixed feelings. But would you change your mobile provider if given the chance?

Comments

Name: Ricardo Verdi Comment:
Where I live in Ireland it has been possible to change mobile provider & keep old number (including prefix) for a few years now. The trouble is, my provider offers reduced price calls + texts to others on the same network. But now we cannot tell from their number which network someone is on. They may have changed. So there are pros & cons.
Rated Article:
Posted: 2007-01-22 07:28:34
IP Logged as: 87.232.43.104 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; SpamBlockerUtility 4.8.0) Report This Comment

Name: Will Comment:
This is a good news for all Malaysian. It creates competition among the service providers. It gives mobile users more options to switch for better service, coverage and of course $$$
Rated Article:
Posted: 2007-01-21 19:28:23
IP Logged as: 219.95.238.6 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061206 Firefox/1.5.0.9 Report This Comment

Name: Stormer Comment:
MNP should be pushed through just for the sake of "Malaysia boleh!" We "boleh" everything, so we should show that we are on the forefront of technology and open markets with healthy competition.

Let protectionism go and let the cards fall where they may, a level playing field for all.
Rated Article:
Posted: 2007-01-18 11:14:38
IP Logged as: 202.190.132.217 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Report This Comment

Name: bent Comment:
this is very good news. i'd switch from maxis to digi even if i had to fork out up to rm500. maxis has been an arrogant bastard of a mobile provider for many years thinking they can do whatever they like just because they had a majority of the consumers. i urge all other maxis users to join other mobile providers if this MNP goes through. down with maxis!!
Rated Article:
Posted: 2007-01-18 10:52:30
IP Logged as: 219.95.209.138 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0 Report This Comment

Name: chanlman Comment:
I would stay with current operator, i.e. maxis. Reason because of coverage and service. At least I get to call 123 for FREE and get problem resolved. The next operator of cos is digi, price fight, advertise BIG BIG, but coverage little bit. I think maybe more 016 numbers coming to maxis also...

Anyway... MNP main aim is to satisfy customers need in terms of customer service, price and flexible package that we want.happy-smiley
Rated Article:
Posted: 2007-01-17 18:12:30
IP Logged as: 202.75.160.254 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; (R1 1.1); .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1) Report This Comment

Name: kerek Comment:
huyo..cambest...
then how bout billing???forpostpaid users, they have to update their current address selalu la...

huwahahahahaha anyway...each of the phone operator has their own strategi and users..so dunno what im talking rite now la (now i tgh tingtong..!)
Rated Article:
Posted: 2007-01-17 15:58:35
IP Logged as: 218.111.143.25 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061206 Firefox/1.5.0.9 Report This Comment

Name: KhairulFathi Comment:
Ive been living in South Korea for 6 years now
They'd implemented this system about 3 years ago
It seems very good system to me since local phone operators keep offering latest promotions and features to attract more customers thumbsup
3G kinda old here :p
And i easily switch to each other whenever i like thumbsup
However this only works the best with contract and postpaid only, not prepaid, or else people will use it wrongly thumbsdown
Rated Article:
Posted: 2007-01-17 00:22:00
IP Logged as: 219.95.88.164 HomePage: http://ppmkonline.net Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1) Report This Comment

Name: anti-suck Comment:
by that time, maxis and celcom will lose all the customers because of their suck service.
thumbsdownthumbsdownthumbsdownthumbsdownthumbsdownthumbsdown
Rated Article:
Posted: 2007-01-16 12:29:23
IP Logged as: 202.179.119.185 HomePage: http://null.null.com Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1 Report This Comment

Name: carpathi Comment:
wat is ur current operator?happy-smileyhappy-smileyhappy-smileyhappy-smiley
Rated Article:
Posted: 2007-01-16 07:34:37
IP Logged as: 218.208.239.127 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; (R1 1.5); FDM; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; MEGAUPLOAD 1.0) Report This Comment

Name: Kao Comment:
Can't wait to see, but , contract bound?
Nasty.

I would see how hotlink,digi,celcom fight with the numbers issues.
Rated Article:
Posted: 2007-01-16 03:22:49
IP Logged as: 219.95.199.213 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Report This Comment

Name: bobtiang Comment:
yes! finally i can try Digi after some long years with Hotlink.

RM10 looks good to me. I don't mind pay for it to compensate others benefit offer by my next choice.
Rated Article:
Posted: 2007-01-16 02:42:24
IP Logged as: 192.55.52.2 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1 Report This Comment

Name: carpathia Comment:
this is one piece of old tech ( japan and HK already have this 2-3 yrs ago). i cant wait for it and then i will switch operators!
Rated Article:
Posted: 2007-01-15 17:10:04
IP Logged as: 202.188.162.24 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061206 Firefox/1.5.0.9 Report This Comment

Comment on this article


Your Name:

Your Email Address:

Your Homepage:

Rate this article:
Poor Great

Comment:
BOLD "QUOTE" UNDERLINE

< Prev   Next >
 
Top! Top!