Great Deal from Dell™
Close Me

Great Deal from Dell™
Dell™ XPS™ M1530 - Powered by Intel® Centrino® processor technology
+ FREE Hard Drive Upgrade

 
 
Sunday, 23 November 2008 03:39 AM
 
 
 
 
978 visitors online
Main Menu
Home
News
Forums
Links
Contact Us
Search
Advertising
Guides
Reviews
Demographics
Administrator
Lowyat Pricelists






nokia
sony


Advertisements



Google inches one step closer to world domination
(21 votes)
by Wern Shen   
Thursday, 04 September 2008 11:17 AM

Since it’s launch, Google Chrome has been the hottest thing since sliced bread in the computing world. It’s fast, it’s light weight and it’s free. What else could one ask for in a browser, right? Well, for the average Joe, nothing much.

    

Unfortunately, average Internet users we are not, and after a couple of hours of what we would classify as “normal usage“, we stumbled across a couple of interesting issues. We’ll be sharing some of our thoughts about this new browser after the jump.


The first thing that irked us about Google Chrome was the fact that downloading the installer wasn’t actually downloading the installer. It took less than a minute for the download to complete, but much to our chagrin, it wasn’t an installer but a download client. Why Google thought this was necessary, we will never know - but what we do know is that Mozilla doesn’t do that with Firefox. Thankfully, the download client didn’t take too long to complete the download. We clocked it at about two minutes, but with the volatility of Streamyx, please do not take our word as testament.



Upon completion, we launched the browser and it loaded up almost instantly - definitely faster than any version of Firefox we’ve ever used, but fractionally slower than a Chuck Norris round house kick. At first glance, the browser looked clean. There wasn’t a toolbar on top, nor was there a status bar on the bottom. There were no finicky menus to click through either.



As we typed a random URL (well, not that random) into the address bar, we discovered that it wasn’t just an address bar. It also doubled up as a search bar! It doesn’t take a genius to figure out what the default search engine is, but if you didn’t already know, it’s Google.

 



Page loading went pretty smoothly, but we weren‘t anal enough to actually time it against Firefox or (gasp!) IE. While reports on the net do state that Chrome isn’t exactly 100% compatible with all the Javascripts out there, we didn’t encounter any problems just yet. Flash loaded decently too, but the built-in pop-up blocker was rather pants. It blocked almost all the “friendly” pop-ups, like the kind we use in our CMS, but let a tons of intrusive pop-up and pop-under spam windows.



Like all new generation browsers, Chrome put a lot of emphasis on tabbed browsing. By double clicking on the title bar or Ctrl + T-ing, new tabs pop-up much like they do in Firefox. Again, like Firefox, you can rearrange the tabs simply by dragging them to the desired order. However, unlike Firefox, you can actually drag out these tabs to turn them into separate windows.



Whether or not you drag them out as separate windows, each tab operates as a separate process. Google says that by programming Chrome this way, this eliminates the entire browser from crashing when an individual tab faces an error.



As innovative as that sounds, Chrome is far from being perfect. One of the major defects it faces is it’s inability to process RSS feeds.



Clicking on an RSS feed in Firefox gives you this…



Whereas clicking on an RSS feed in Chrome gives you this…



The lack of a permanent status bar takes some getting used to, and up till now, I still haven’t gotten used to it yet. I don’t know if I ever will, but that’s a personal quirk of mine.




The download manager on Chrome also needs some serious work. There were many times when we clicked on a download link, waited for the “Save as…” dialogue box to pop-up, didn’t see one, and repeatedly spammed the download link in frustration. It was only when our mouse cried for mercy did we notice that the download had already started…



Now, if you haven’t already done so, click here to download Google Chrome for yourself, and if you already have, then give yourself a big ol’ pat on the back. For more official information regarding Google Chrome, click here, and to participate in our forum discussion, click here.
Comments

Name: Haclon Comment:
I do saw one small problem that is when I open a new tab, there will run the another chrome.exe on that windows task manager as told, but the problem is when I continue open twice the new tab, then I close another tab of the two tab, only one task of chrome.exe will be end task in window task manager. Additionally, I really don't like its download program.
Rated Article:
Posted: 2008-09-15 11:20:22
IP Logged as: 118.100.101.104 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.29 Safari/525.13 Report This Comment

Name: Oracle Comment:
Tried... love the separate process features... it really works like how they claim.

having some problem loading some thumbnails, which I am not pretty sure weather it was javascripted or not, but that site I visited always suffer from heavy traffic and even by using FF or IE, the thumbnails have problem loading.

but the preview image in youtube doesn't load, really, they don't.

but I am already feeling like switching it over FF, if they have all the essential plug-ins i'm using in firefox, that is.happy-smiley
Rated Article:
Posted: 2008-09-10 11:49:20
IP Logged as: 60.54.46.64 HomePage: http://oraclesquare.blogspot.com Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1 Report This Comment

Name: Jamal Sabri Comment:
Salam,

I like its simplicity and minimalistic approach. But, I don't get Yahoo! when I typed into the url but I get Live from Microsoft.
Rated Article:
Posted: 2008-09-08 01:32:08
IP Logged as: 202.190.154.24 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13 Report This Comment

Name: David Comment:
Have you tried out the incognito? Which can be open by pressing Ctrl+Shift+N.

Google claim it will not store any browsing history or cookies, but izzit safe for banking sites?question
Rated Article:
Posted: 2008-09-07 02:45:25
IP Logged as: 202.162.23.250 HomePage: Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; Avant Browser; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; MAXTHON 2.0) Report This Comment

Name: BangMovie.net Comment:
Will wait till this fella mature first....
Rated Article:
Posted: 2008-09-06 17:48:10
IP Logged as: 219.93.205.222 HomePage: http://www.bangmovie.net Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1 Report This Comment

Name: donque Comment:
kakibangku,
read this!
As we typed a random URL (well, not that random) into the address bar, we discovered that it wasn’t just an address bar. It also doubled up as a search bar! It doesn’t take a genius to figure out what the default search engine is, but if you didn’t already know, it’s Google.


Wern Shen,
nice review,jz a slight error. Double clicking the title bar actually resize the browser not adding a new tab. There's a "+" button to add new tab though. Hehe...

btw, i think havin the download manager in the same windows is really chun but it does contradict with google chrome's emphasis on maximising page view.
Rated Article:
Posted: 2008-09-06 11:33:19
IP Logged as: 218.111.50.217 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Safari/525.21 Report This Comment

Name: muhdhafiz Comment:
Good for a beta version thumbsup
but still need LOTS of improvement happy-smiley
Rated Article:
Posted: 2008-09-06 01:59:13
IP Logged as: 218.208.225.196 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13 Report This Comment

Name: wba84 Comment:
Early Security Issues Tarnish Google's Chrome
thumbsdown

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/150639/early_security_issues_tarnish_googles_chrome.html
Rated Article:
Posted: 2008-09-06 00:02:06
IP Logged as: 218.111.208.82 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1 Report This Comment

Name: kakibangku Comment:
bad part
the most annoying part is this browser without search box and also why google chrome use yahoo search engine by default?

good part
it give space to the browser, wide space for our eyes!laughing-smiley
Rated Article:
Posted: 2008-09-05 16:13:23
IP Logged as: 124.13.77.64 HomePage: http://thekakibangku.blogspot.com Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1 Report This Comment

Name: google chrome user Comment:
actually like Firefox, you can actually drag out these tabs to turn them into separate windows. u can even make a window into a tab bigsmile-smiley
Rated Article:
Posted: 2008-09-05 15:11:11
IP Logged as: 124.82.73.132 HomePage: Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13 Report This Comment

Name: skyland Comment:
Speed not so fast, safari & firefox more than this new browser.
bookmark option not good
Rated Article:
Posted: 2008-09-05 01:45:59
IP Logged as: 203.92.154.39 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1 Safari/525.13.3 Report This Comment

Name: badSeed Comment:
i bet u missed the default search engine dialog
asking u what search engine u wanna use or let it be google as default when you run chrome for the 1st time....
Rated Article:
Posted: 2008-09-04 18:32:41
IP Logged as: 124.82.92.178 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13 Report This Comment

Name: Swee Song Comment:
Please try out "Google incognito browser"
Rated Article:
Posted: 2008-09-04 17:59:37
IP Logged as: 202.75.160.254 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Report This Comment

Name: XM Comment:
just try~ not bad not bad~
Rated Article:
Posted: 2008-09-04 16:50:50
IP Logged as: 218.111.163.36 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1 Report This Comment

Name: elephant disease Comment:
hey wern shen... does this help me surf porn faster?
Rated Article:
Posted: 2008-09-04 16:17:53
IP Logged as: 218.111.148.179 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1 Report This Comment

Name: fahrulazmi Comment:
thanks for the info! thumbsup
Rated Article:
Posted: 2008-09-04 15:37:37
IP Logged as: 202.190.136.216 HomePage: http://fahrulazmi.terbaek.com Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080702 Firefox/2.0.0.16 Report This Comment

Name: Feija Comment:
its a beta
Rated Article:
Posted: 2008-09-04 15:07:54
IP Logged as: 210.19.57.10 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13 Report This Comment

Comment on this article


Your Name:

Your Email Address:

Your Homepage:

Rate this article:
Poor Great

Comment:
BOLD "QUOTE" UNDERLINE

< Prev   Next >
 
Top! Top!